Am i the only one who finds tgat this thread is sad???

Big taboo: ask the pastoral care people at those schools you mentioned about eating disorders... see what they say (i know 2 girls with ED at Jags and they there area lot more. Our Headmistress told me there were a few at St Paul). It is shocking. Those girls are under A LOT of pressure.

I m not judging you OP i promise and i understand where you are coming from. This is the system and one has to play it. But....

How about letting your daughter finds her spark and nurture in her a love of learning by supporting her and arouse her curiosity? Then see where she end up. Girls and bots should aim for thestars but not in a pressured way. I think it counter productive.

Why is the UK the only country in Europe that sees the primary abd secondary education as a competition?

I find this post interesting as one of the local mums of a child in year 4 in one of local 'outstanding' primaries with the next school destination being the top priory. I have been to all schools mentioned and although agree St.Paul is probably top academically, I know this is outside of the reach of my daughter based on her current school results.
However from my personal experience there are things beyond school environment which are important, so for those whose kids can not go to top academic schools, nothing yet has been determined.
I come from overseas and do not have any kind of elite academic background. I work in the City and some of my colleagues come from Oxbridge (which I suppose the end goal for those who want to go to St.Paul and other elite schools), however, I was able to progress further in my career compared to my more privileged colleagues (I was very surprised now to learn from Labour tax manifesto that I am supposed to be in the top 5% of all earners in this country) . It just shows that other things like personal drive matter more. All my education was for free and from overseas and unfortunately I am not talented in any traditional ways but just very determined and self driven. Now like all parents I would like to give the best to my children and prepared to invest what I can in their education, just to be constantly watching over then to ensure they do their homework and benefit from all my 'investment' in them. In my heart I understand this is wrong because I can not be watching them all the time and they must learn to be self efficient, but as all other parents are doing the same, it feels necessary to keep them on the level playing fields with others. Not sure if anyone has similar dilemmas, but just wanted to stress that elite education is not that necessary on its own and I know of some firms in the city who now dropped university degree as a requirement for enter.

Good luck

Thanks for all those info!!
I think with the Overground it's now rather practical to get there, but as it's fairly new people probably don't think about it too much yet and JAGS remain the top choice. In any case, I think we will just go with school + tutoring and see where we land.
Thanks all.

I think it's absolutely to do with location - most of the bright boys round here would head to KCS Wimbledon with JAGS or Alleyn's for girls. Don't forget that the 13+ schools send a lot of their very bright kids to boarding school. It's not really about the schools not being able to get the children in but really just the schools the parents round here choose to send their kids to. This part of London has quite a defined social demographic so there's a bit of a herd instinct when it comes to school choice. If you don't know anyone with kids at St Paul's then you're unlikely to send your own there. There's nothing to stop your daughter getting into any school if she's bright enough no matter which prep or primary she goes to. However as others have done though I would counsel against setting your heart on a particular school. It's too much pressure both for her and for you. Let her enjoy her all too brief years of childhood without worrying about the next stage. Happy children do better in the long run than miserable ones.

Location is important indeed....most families look for secondary schools that are within a reasonable distance from their house, as most families also have younger siblings in local schools so can't easily move.

However, I think the stats published by the private schools (Eaton house, Thomas's and so on) report offers made not offers taken. There are indeed very few children from the local private schools going to City of London, St Pauls, Westminster. Not sure why this is.

Location is an important point. i know of someone that had offers at both St. Paul's and COL but went for Jags for a number of reasons- location being one. She was at Honeywell.

Agree with what others have told you that the reason schools around here don't send kids to SPG or City is that JAGS is at the same level academically and much closer geographically (and has a much better site than City).

Also do bear in mind that school's reputations can change a lot in a fairly short space of time so the most in demand schools may be different by the time your daughter gets there. For instance, City has had a PR disaster with this year's admissions process which may affects its applications for a few years going forward.

I have heard too of Bute House being of feeder for St Paul's.
Getting in is very difficult though (I think they say it's by ballot), and then you'll have to think about moving somewhere close to the school.
But you should definitely go visit Bute House and see how you like it.
My friend was looking at Bute House for the same reason (being a feeder for St Paul), but liked Hornsby House more ...
It's all very personal and again, the closer you are to the start of reception year the better you'll know which school suits your child.

Hi CDSW12, You've had a lot of helpful answers so far, but if you would like to chat through things in person then please do look us up on the web at IWSchoolingConsultants.co.uk. London schooling options are a bit of a minefield and can certainly seem a little daunting when you first start looking into them, but with a bit of further reading and some pointing in the right the direction you can certainly start to make sense of it all. There really are a range of great schools out there to suit a variety of children's needs so I am sure you will eventually find one that suits your daughter to a tee.

Speaking from experience please do not believe there is a school that will get your child into St Pauls or LCSG. If your child is not right for these schools no prep school will be able to get them in !

Its a tough process - you don't know how your child is going to react to the exam and to be sitting in a room with another 400 / 500 (in Alleyn's case 700!) children.

So please please don't decide now what secondary school you would like your child to go to. So many factors change and I honestly do not believe you really know what the right school is until the end of Year 5.

But if you really believe that St Paul's is the right school for your daughter then the only real "feeder" they have is Bute House in Hammersmith. I believe half the girls from Bute House move on to St Paul's every year.

Good luck with it all.

. This is impossible for you to assess when the child is much younger.

Couldn't agree more.

I have many friends who planned out their children Le's education at a young age and discovered, much later, that their plans were irrelevant.

It's on both sides though, highly stimulated/young children surrounded by a house full of books will appear more academic than they actually are, bright children whose parents are more laissez faire will appear less so. When a child is 9/10 those differences tend to make themselves known,

I'm not saying planning is wrong, not by any means, just keep your options open!

You can always call the registrars at St Paul/LSG and ask where they take girls from.
They'll ask you which school your child goes to, but you can explain you are looking to make a decision for primary school...but still, they'll need to know roughly the area where you live.

The other thing to bear in mind: when you look to make a decision for secondary school, one of the main things you consider is fit with your child's personality/interests (academic, sporty, arty, uber confident, etc). This is impossible for you to assess when the child is much younger. So this discussion is somehow academic, as you will see things very differently when your child is 9/10.

just had a quick scan of the Sunday Times list of Top performing London Schools, note the following
At #1 St Pauls girls
At #6 City of London Girls
At #12 Jags
At #24 Putney

I know Jags have been higher and Putney is usually #1, so I would go with your gut and your expectations of careers.
Most girls at Jags aim for law and medicine.
At Putney its international business and accountany.
Don't know about the others.

CDSW12 wrote:When we visited Honeywell the other day, after he bragged about his results for 5 minutes, I asked the headteacher if they had anyone going to London Cty. He answered, "oh but those are the elite". So I don't think he'd agree with you that JAGS is as good for instance.

Anyone who thinks that City of London Girls' School is in a different league to JAGS doesn't have a clue. I mean, you can go look at their GCSE and A level results and see that JAGS (slightly, on average) outperforms City of London Girls' School. That's before sporting and other non-academic facilities are taken into account.