by Moomin » Tue Oct 10, 2017 2:49 pm
Thanks for the replies, our house backs on to the school (80m away) and it just seems crazy that most likely a whole intake would be made up of siblings, seeing as the situation has been perpetuated by allowing a large catchment for years, then not accounting for the sibling bulge created by halving the intake instead of decreasing slowly to 45.
I have no idea how they/the council would be convinced by creating an intake of 45 though.
Would prefer not to travel for 1 hour return journey each day on foot when there is a school less than 30 seconds walk away!
Thanks for the replies, our house backs on to the school (80m away) and it just seems crazy that most likely a whole intake would be made up of siblings, seeing as the situation has been perpetuated by allowing a large catchment for years, then not accounting for the sibling bulge created by halving the intake instead of decreasing slowly to 45.
I have no idea how they/the council would be convinced by creating an intake of 45 though.
Would prefer not to travel for 1 hour return journey each day on foot when there is a school less than 30 seconds walk away!